Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Isochrone dev #35

Open
wants to merge 35 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Isochrone dev #35

wants to merge 35 commits into from

Conversation

AlexaVillaume
Copy link
Collaborator

Changed the branch name to better reflect the work that is actually being done

… the imf weight and normalization functions should go for the purposes of getting m2l
… S.isochrone_grid.metallicities == -0.50, is the same problem Connor is seeing when running the test_isochrone unit test
…omething is wrong with how we're constructing the isochrone andor selecting a given isochrone from the grid -- I am creating a new notebook to dig into this issue specificially
…not preclude some other problem in the creation of the grid itself. See how nothing comes back for age 10.1, 10.2, 10.3
…ues all in regards to fixing the isochrone selection
…sochrone grid and isochrone selection...hopefully now I will have an easier time debugging the this now that the isochrones should at least be correct
@AlexaVillaume
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I guess changing the branch name automatically closed PR #34, which still needs review.

… that it will make establishing paths less of of a headache
@AlexaVillaume AlexaVillaume marked this pull request as ready for review November 22, 2023 22:51
@ConnorStoneAstro
Copy link
Member

I don't think adding an environment variable is the right way to go. This will mean that users will have to add this as part of the install process which can be annoying. Using relative imports and paths should be able to handle most of these cases. If it is an issue keeping track of where the isochrones are stored, we may want to think about having the user specify where these are stored as an input to the isochrone object instead of trying to hide the lookup tables in the directory structure of the code

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants