Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 23, 2024. It is now read-only.

chore(deps): update dependency eslint to v8.56.0 #41

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Dec 16, 2023

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
eslint (source) 8.55.0 -> 8.56.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

eslint/eslint (eslint)

v8.56.0

Compare Source

Features
  • 0dd9704 feat: Support custom severity when reporting unused disable directives (#​17212) (Bryan Mishkin)
  • 31a7e3f feat: fix no-restricted-properties false negatives with unknown objects (#​17818) (Arka Pratim Chaudhuri)
Bug Fixes
  • 7d5e5f6 fix: TypeError: fs.exists is not a function on read-only file system (#​17846) (Francesco Trotta)
  • 74739c8 fix: suggestion with invalid syntax in no-promise-executor-return rule (#​17812) (Bryan Mishkin)
Documentation
  • 9007719 docs: update link in ways-to-extend.md (#​17839) (Amel SELMANE)
  • 3a22236 docs: Update README (GitHub Actions Bot)
  • 54c3ca6 docs: fix migration-guide example (#​17829) (Tanuj Kanti)
  • 4391b71 docs: check config comments in rule examples (#​17815) (Francesco Trotta)
  • fd28363 docs: remove mention about ESLint stylistic rules in readme (#​17810) (Zwyx)
  • 48ed5a6 docs: Update README (GitHub Actions Bot)
Chores

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

This PR has 2 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Extra Small
Size       : +1 -1
Percentile : 0.8%

Total files changed: 2

Change summary by file extension:
.json : +1 -1
.lock : +0 -0

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants