-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
VER-93564-podfact-package #837
Open
HaoYang0000
wants to merge
113
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
VER-93564-podfact-package
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
+1,165
−689
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This pulls in the latest vclusterops library changes. Many of the changes that we are pulling in were changes related to improving the vcluster CLI.
This pulls in the new signature for VStartDatabase. A new parameter was returned, which we can safely ignore for the operators usage.
During a replicated upgrade, we must categorize the subclusters into one of two replica groups. Initially, all subclusters participating in the upgrade will be placed in replica group A. Subsequently, new subclusters will be generated throughout the process and assigned to the second group, named replica group B. This change manages the assignment of subclusters at the beginning of the upgrade process. To facilitate this change, new status fields will be introduced to the VerticaDB, enabling the tracking of this state across reconcile iterations.
This adds a new controller for sandbox. It is going to watch a ConfigMap that has labels on it to indicate it contains state for a sandbox. That ConfigMap also contains the vdb name whose subclusters are involved in sandbox/unsanbox. For now it simply reads the VerticaDB found in the configMap and do nothing else. Some changes are also made to the VerticaDB API to add new fields related to sanbox
This PR eliminates labels from the `VerticaReplicator` sample config. The intention is to enhance the user experience on OpenShift when generating this CR from the webUI. OpenShift utilizes this sample to prepopulate fields in the webUI interface.
This adds a few webhook rules for replicated upgrade. It's probably not a complete list, but we can always add more later when we find rules to check. This commit adds the following: - ensures the subclusters involved in the upgrade are stable. They cannot be removed and the sizes can't change. - We do allow new subclusters to be added to one of the replica groups. But they must be secondary subclusters. No new primaries. - ensures that subclusters listed in the `.status.updateState.replicaGroups` aren't repeated.
We now collect the sandbox name in podfacts. We updated the vsql query to return the extra state. We built an interface to get the information as we intend to use a REST endpoint in the future but still need support via vsql for older releases.
This adds a new leg, e2e-leg-9, to the CI. This is going to be used to test changes done in 24.3.0. One new change with this is that it will use a vertica license so that we can test scaling past 3 nodes. This will be required in order to test out the new replicated upgrade work.
#764) `vrep` reconciler enforces the minimum source and target db versions to be at least 24.3.0 --------- Co-authored-by: Roy Paulin <rnguetsopken@opentext.com> Co-authored-by: spilchen <mspilchen@opentext.com>
This PR adds below webhooks rules for sandboxes in CRD: - cannot scale (up or down) any subcluster that is in a sandbox - cannot remove a subcluster that is sandboxed. It must be unsandboxed first. - cannot have multiple sandboxes with the same name - cannot have the image of a sandbox be different than the main cluster before the sandbox has been setup - cannot be used on versions older than 24.3.0 - cannot be used before the database has been initialized - cannot have duplicate subclusters defined in a sandbox - cannot have a subcluster defined in multiple sandboxes - cannot have a non-existing subcluster defined in a sandbox We could add more rules later for sandboxes when we have needs.
we want to use restart reconciler in both the VerticaDB controller and the sandbox controller. This makes some changes to the restart reconciler in order to achieve that. The sandbox name (empty string if VerticaDB controller) is passed to the reconciler and it uses it to target only pods belonging to that sandbox( or to target only pods belonging to the main cluster if sandbox name is empty)
This change adds stubs to the replicated upgrade reconciler. It attempts to have the functions present that are needed to do the upgrade. Due to dependencies, such as sandboxing and replication, comprehensive testing is currently limited to unit tests. While this logic might evolve during integration, it gives a framework for how the upgrade should function. Additionally, I identified new requirements for state management. Two new annotations have been introduced to the VerticaDB: - vertica.com/replicated-upgrade-sandbox: to record the name of the sandbox created for the upgrade - vertica.com/replicated-upgrade-replicator-name: to track the name of the VerticaReplicator CR utilized for replicating data to the sandbox.
This PR adds a new webhook rule for sandboxes in CRD: cannot have a primary subcluster defined in a sandbox.
This adds a new fetcher in podfacts to fetch node details from the running database inside the pod. This new fetcher will call VClusterOps API which will send an HTTP request to the database. The new fetcher will be enabled when VclusterOps annotation is set, and Vertica server version is not older than v24.3.0. The new fetcher should be faster and more reliable than the old fetcher which will execute vsql within the pod.
In the replicated upgrade process, we must pause and redirect client connections from subclusters in replica group A to those in replica group B. This is the initial stage of the change. Currently, pause/redirect semantics are not supported, as they require new server modifications that have not yet been implemented. Therefore, we will perform an old-style drain to pause the process and maintain service labels correctly to point to subclusters in replica group B for redirection. --------- Co-authored-by: Roy Paulin <rnguetsopken@opentext.com>
This change will modify the upgrade reconcilers, both offline and online, to function in either the main cluster or a sandbox. Our immediate plan is to use the offline upgrade reconciler within the sandbox controller, although this will be done in a follow-on task.
This pull request modifies the Vertica replicator controller to invoke the replication command synchronously. Additionally, it introduces new status conditions within VerticaReplicator to monitor the controller's various states. --------- Co-authored-by: spilchen <mspilchen@opentext.com>
If we had selected an upgrade method but ended up failing back to a different method because something was incompatible, we are going to log an event. For instance, if we requested something other than offline upgrade, but we end up in the offline upgrade code path we will have an event message like this: ``` Normal IncompatibleUpgradeRequested 7m20s verticadb-operator Requested upgrade is incompatible with the Vertica deployment. Falling back to offline upgrade. ```
This PR adds sandbox reconciler to VerticaDB controller. The reconciler will add subclusters to sandboxes in the database. The change of sandbox fields in CRD will trigger sandbox reconciler, then the reconciler will call vclusterOps to add subclusters to sandboxes.
This will add a status message to the `.status.upgradeStatus` field in the VerticaDB as the operator goes through the various stages of replicated upgrade. It reuses the same design for the other upgrade methods in that we only advance the status message forward. This means that we need to reconcile an iteration, we won't report the first status message again.
Automated changes by pre-release.yml GitHub action Signed-off-by: GitHub <noreply@github.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Spilchen <mspilchen@opentext.com> Co-authored-by: spilchen <spilchen@users.noreply.github.com>
After promoting sandbox to main, we need to delete sandbox config map to avoid any kind of conflicts as the sandbox does not exist anymore.
The new upgrade policy will be `Online` instead of `Replicated`. What was formerly called `Online` is now `ReadOnlyOnline` upgrade
Latest vclusterops fix a bug that would incorrectly trim nodes from sandbox clusters if not included in --node-names, when --node-names is specified
Signed-off-by: GitHub <noreply@github.com> Co-authored-by: Matt Spilchen <mspilchen@opentext.com> Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: spilchen <spilchen@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: roypaulin <roypaulin@users.noreply.github.com>
Because we cannot reuse a sandbox name after promotion, a uuid is appended for each online upgrade run. The operator will first try to get the sandbox name from an annotation(useful for testing). If the annotation is not set, it will build a name that contains a uid.
…ade (#854) When you do back to back online upgrade, the 2nd time, the new sts names contain the subcluster to mimic names. If any of the names contains an underscore, the sts name will be invalid. This PR converts underscore to hyphen to prevent that.
This PR fixed re-ip error when restart the cluster by checking all pods are up and NMA is running in all pods. Without the check, vclusterOps re-ip could fail when NMA is not running or half of the primary nodes are not up.
Signed-off-by: GitHub <noreply@github.com> Co-authored-by: Matt Spilchen <mspilchen@opentext.com> Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: spilchen <spilchen@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: roypaulin <roypaulin@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Roy Paulin <rnguetsopken@opentext.com>
HaoYang0000
requested review from
fenic-fawkes,
qindotguan and
LiboYu2
as code owners
October 17, 2024 09:27
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR: