Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Let's revive the project. #144

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Sep 30, 2023
Merged

Let's revive the project. #144

merged 14 commits into from
Sep 30, 2023

Conversation

typeswitch-dev
Copy link
Contributor

Lots of changes to kick things off again:

  • Removed the bare declaration syntax,

    foo : bar -- baz
    foo = etc
    

    in favor of def(foo, bar -- baz, etc). This is in preparation for making the top-level more useful & simplifying stuff. The exact "bare declaration" syntax is probably not coming back, but I'm hope to have a nicer syntax than def at some point.

  • Likewise removed data ... end in favor of data(...) syntax everywhere.

  • Refactoring. Using lazy values in a table instead of managing that state manually (and poorly). (Still a WIP.)

  • Added BSD Zero Clause License.

@typeswitch-dev typeswitch-dev merged commit 2fa8631 into main Sep 30, 2023
5 checks passed
@typeswitch-dev typeswitch-dev deleted the mirth-revival branch September 30, 2023 21:59
@kephas
Copy link

kephas commented Jan 21, 2024

Do you intend to take a similar approach to Factor and have very few primitive syntax. That is, in the way you can create MEMO: in Factor, will it be possible to add defmemo() with user code in mirth?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants