Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DXCDT-522: auth0_attack_protection resource export support #817

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 31, 2023

Conversation

willvedd
Copy link
Contributor

🔧 Changes

Introducing support for exporting the auth0_attack_protection resource with the reverse terraform functionality.

The output will appear like this:

import {
  id = "c85d9c38-90e5-4fea-9838-fa51ba488fbf"
  to = auth0_attack_protection.attack_protection
}

📚 References

Related PRs: #808, #797, #810, #809, #812, #813, #811, #816

🔬 Testing

Adding unit tests, manually verified.

📝 Checklist

  • All new/changed/fixed functionality is covered by tests (or N/A)
  • I have added documentation for all new/changed functionality (or N/A)

@willvedd willvedd requested a review from a team as a code owner August 30, 2023 19:00
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Aug 30, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 77.77% and no project coverage change.

Comparison is base (33296c4) 72.37% compared to head (5d3a5df) 72.38%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #817   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   72.37%   72.38%           
=======================================
  Files          91       91           
  Lines       11635    11644    +9     
=======================================
+ Hits         8421     8428    +7     
- Misses       2709     2711    +2     
  Partials      505      505           
Files Changed Coverage Δ
internal/cli/terraform.go 62.63% <0.00%> (-0.47%) ⬇️
internal/cli/terraform_fetcher.go 98.59% <100.00%> (+0.04%) ⬆️

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants