MG-1963 - Remove TCP config from CoAP server #2139
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
felixgateru
force-pushed
the
MG-1963_coap_tls
branch
3 times, most recently
from
87bc802
to
e9e2f98
Compare
felixgateru
changed the title
rodneyosodo
force-pushed
the
MG-1963_coap_tls
branch
from
e9e2f98
to
fc2522d
Compare
rodneyosodo
approved these changes
Apr 11, 2024
Signed-off-by: 1998-felix <felix.gateru@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: 1998-felix <felix.gateru@gmail.com>
felixgateru
force-pushed
the
MG-1963_coap_tls
branch
from
fc2522d
to
375cd38
Compare
dborovcanin
approved these changes
Apr 11, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What type of PR is this?
This is a refactor as it removes a tcp config from the coap server
What does this do?
This removes
go-coap.ListenAndServeTCPTLSas it only supports TCP connections.Which issue(s) does this PR fix/relate to?
Have you included tests for your changes?
No,
Did you document any new/modified feature?
No,
Notes