Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Amplitude extraction #7

Open
fjsouzageo opened this issue Mar 18, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Amplitude extraction #7

fjsouzageo opened this issue Mar 18, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@fjsouzageo
Copy link

Hello! I've been working for a few days with the wedge model code (1412_Tuning_and_AVO/tuning_wedge_v2.py). Thanks for sharing it. I'm not a programmer and it is really helping me.

I would like to share a question and hear your opinion about it: in the algorithm, the graph "thickness vs amplitude" is constructed by extracting the amplitude over the upper time of the modeled wedge layer, that is, a time-slice extraction. However, as the algorithm itself shows, sometimes the seismic reflector mismatches the modeled interface.

So, my question is: wouldn't it be more appropriate to make te code extract the maximum amplitude of the synthetic reflector? By doing this we would be simulating how the amplitude would actually be if the reflector was mapped.

To illustrate, I made this change in the code and generated two figures, comparing this graph to the scenarios:

First, as the code is now:
image

And with the suggested amplitude extraction to the maximum:
image

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant