You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Something strange is going on with the new format to add package includes. I found out about this when trying to add experimental.gracefulblobmissing to a setup:
Does not add experimental.gracefulblobmissing to the site.zcml. But that this parameter is no longer working is probably missed by many, because they also have
in their mx.ini, and this registration add the zcml for the main package also to the site.zcml:
<!-- INCLUDES mysite_policy -->
<include package="mysite_policy" />
I have another issue open with this template where the db_blob(s)_location rename deprecation is not working, #25. Is something more in general wrong with the deprecation code in cookiecutter or this template?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
zcml_package_includes
A string with comma separated configure.zcml files from packages to include.
Examples: "my.fancypackage" or "myns.mypackage, collective.example"
Default: empty string
Something strange is going on with the new format to add package includes. I found out about this when trying to add experimental.gracefulblobmissing to a setup:
This is deprecated in the instance.yaml
It throws a warning, but stil adds both package to the ./instance/etc/site.zcml
The new format:
Does not add experimental.gracefulblobmissing to the site.zcml. But that this parameter is no longer working is probably missed by many, because they also have
in their mx.ini, and this registration add the zcml for the main package also to the site.zcml:
I have another issue open with this template where the db_blob(s)_location rename deprecation is not working, #25. Is something more in general wrong with the deprecation code in cookiecutter or this template?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: