You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
(I posted this on the discourse channel as well - apologies for cross-posting)
I’ve been using java-libs to flatten a template, i.e., apply all of its constraints and print the resulting archetype. This is working wonderfully - but the end result is missing terminology and language bindings - this makes it rather unusable when generating a UI, for instance.
Updating the Flattener code to keep these bindings is an option, but seems complex: internal node-ids would have to be updated (these are typically re-used in archetypes, e.g., at0004) to have unique terminology bindings across the archetypes.
Thoughts?
Thanks,
William
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
(I posted this on the discourse channel as well - apologies for cross-posting)
I’ve been using java-libs to flatten a template, i.e., apply all of its constraints and print the resulting archetype. This is working wonderfully - but the end result is missing terminology and language bindings - this makes it rather unusable when generating a UI, for instance.
Updating the Flattener code to keep these bindings is an option, but seems complex: internal node-ids would have to be updated (these are typically re-used in archetypes, e.g., at0004) to have unique terminology bindings across the archetypes.
Thoughts?
Thanks,
William
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: