Mixed rmTypeName from RM and Java

[ppazos]

Some CObjects have rmTypeName equals as the specification, and some others have the Java class names, e.g. DvQuantity (Java) instead of DV_QUANTITY (specs).

I believe all rmTypeNames should be as the specs. Is that a bug or is on purpose?

[rongchen]

That's a bug. Thanks, Pablo!
/Rong

On 3 September 2013 04:18, Pablo Pazos notifications@github.com wrote:

Some CObjects have rmTypeName equals as the specification, and some others
have the Java class names, e.g. DvQuantity (Java) instead of DV_QUANTITY
(specs).

I believe all rmTypeNames should be as the specs. Is that a bug or is on
purpose?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/7
.

[ppazos]

Thanks Rong, I'm on this issue.

List of problematic types:

• CODE_PHRASE > CodePhrase
• DV_QUANTITY > DvQuantity
• DV_DURATION > DvDuration
• DV_ORDINAL > DvOrdinal

BTW, is ok for a CPrimitiveObject to have rmTypeName == "Boolean" when the CPO is contained in a CComplexObject with rmTypeName == "DV_BOOLEAN"?

[ppazos]

I have questions about types mentioned on RMInspector.java and RMObjectBuilder.

Should these be RM type names or Java class names?

private static final String[] SKIPPED_TYPES_IN_MATCHING = { "DvDateTime",
"DvDate", "DvTime", "DvDuration", "Cluster",
// due to clash with DvText
"TerminologyID", "ArchetypeID", "TemplateID", "ISO_OID",
"HierObjectID", "DvBoolean", "InternetID", "UUID",
"ObjectVersionID"
};

[icorbal]

Thanks for the fix! :-)

[ppazos]

Thank you Iago. There are some questions pending in my previous messages, if Rong is around I would like his input to be sure the solution to this issue is ok, or maybe I have to change something.