-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 156
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Are there plans to add inverse kinematics to the model library? #24
Comments
There are no plans at the moment. You can e.g. use the library which is also used by ROS, orocos_kdl. |
You might want to consider trac_ik instead. Also comes as a stand-alone version (ie: no ROS) and is 'better' than KDL in most cases. |
@gavanderhoorn Thanks for this suggestion!
It seems that even the |
A small warning on |
hm, either I'm misremembering, or something changed since I last looked at it. |
@miguelprada: did that also happen when you configured the Default is |
@fwalch: just curious. Why do you guys not provide an FK solver for your robots (in the non-ROS context then of course)? |
To be honest, I haven't played with it a lot myself either. A colleague, @asierfernandez, was trying to use it to improve the solver performance for a dense trajectory of cartesian end-effector poses, where we definitely do not want configuration changes between one sample and the next, and he had some issues with this. I'm not sure how this effort ended up. |
this is getting off-topic here, but: check the configuration, as I wrote, |
@gavanderhoorn would you please share the link of the stand-alone trac_ik ? (all I found is the ROS one) |
Or can i get the inverse kinematics in any other way outside of ROS?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: