Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

2024 August VeC SC Meeting #316

Open
ATATC opened this issue Jul 24, 2024 · 10 comments
Open

2024 August VeC SC Meeting #316

ATATC opened this issue Jul 24, 2024 · 10 comments
Assignees
Labels
code review Code review or comment documentation Improvements or additions to documentation report Discussed in the meeting

Comments

@ATATC
Copy link
Member

ATATC commented Jul 24, 2024

This thread records the 2024 August VeC Steering Council Meeting (@ProjectNeura/vec-steering-council).

@ATATC ATATC added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation code review Code review or comment report Discussed in the meeting labels Jul 24, 2024
ATATC added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 25, 2024
ATATC added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 26, 2024
ATATC added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 4, 2024
ATATC added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 4, 2024
* Optimized dependency profiles. (#340)

* Added `leads_vec_dp`. (#340)

* Docs. (#340)

* Improved workflow. (#340)

* Updated pyproject.toml. (#340)

* Code reformatted. (#340)

* Code reformatted. (#340)

* Added dependency `pyyaml`. (#340)

* Docs. (#340)

* Supported inferences. (#340)

* Added an output for `InferredDataset.complete()`. (#340)

* Code reformatted. (#340)

* Added `latency_invalid()`. (#340)

* Bug fixed: new latency is negative. (#340)

* Code reformatted. (#340)

* Code reformatted. (#340)

* Bug fixed: avoided `nan`s. (#340)

* Bug fixed: avoided `nan`s. (#340)

* Supported visual data analysis. (#340)

* Added commands. (#340)

* Code reformatted. (#340)

* Docs. (#340)

* Added command `save-as`. (#340)

* Updated LEADS.pptx. (#316) (#340)

---------

Signed-off-by: Terry Fu <futerry@outlook.com>
@ATATC
Copy link
Member Author

ATATC commented Aug 5, 2024

Key Updates

  • Video support
    • Multiple cameras
    • Streaming
    • Recording and extracting
    • Replaying
  • AI support
  • LEADS VeC Data Processor

@qmascarenhas
Copy link
Contributor

@ATATC Here's a link to the UofT Formula SAE Electric racing team: https://fsaeutoronto.ca/. You will notice they are also doing autonomous drive.

@ATATC
Copy link
Member Author

ATATC commented Aug 8, 2024

image
image

@ATATC
Copy link
Member Author

ATATC commented Aug 8, 2024

A Raspberry Pi 5 is better for us because the CPU on the Nvidia Jetson is worse than the Pi, and Pillow does not use GPU.

@qmascarenhas
Copy link
Contributor

This should be one of the questions we can solicit some advice for from @LunjunZhang and @MollieBianchi.

@ATATC
Copy link
Member Author

ATATC commented Aug 13, 2024

I've talked with a friend in the industry, a Raspberry Pi 5 seems no longer to be the choice. Orange Pi 5 is killing everything including Jetson.

@ATATC
Copy link
Member Author

ATATC commented Aug 19, 2024

This research supports Orange Pi 5: https://github.com/geerlingguy/sbc-reviews.

@ATATC
Copy link
Member Author

ATATC commented Sep 10, 2024

Task Board

  1. Get another Arduino Micro - Component Proposal: Arduino Micro #393
  2. Get the accelerometer soldered - Component Proposal: 9-DOF IMU (Accelerometer) #91
  3. Get the Orange Pi - Component Proposal: Orange Pi 5 Pro 8GB #395
  4. Reinstall everything
  5. Collect data

@ATATC ATATC pinned this issue Sep 10, 2024
@ATATC
Copy link
Member Author

ATATC commented Oct 3, 2024

@aforti86 Hi sir, could you please post the data recorded here?

@aforti86
Copy link

aforti86 commented Oct 3, 2024

Here they are. I'll upload some more tonight. I'll try to separate it out by driver tonight to have better separation instead of just random breaks.
2024-10-02_15-17-36.csv
2024-10-02_15-28-49.csv
2024-10-02_15-38-20.csv

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
code review Code review or comment documentation Improvements or additions to documentation report Discussed in the meeting
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants